One of the most common questions we get asked by our business and corporate clients relates to employment law and relationships with their employees in regard to restraint of trade clauses and their enforceability.
Whilst we are discussing employment contracts in this article it should be noted restraint clauses are also found in business sale contracts.
Whilst the legal principles might be the same, they are often viewed more strictly when seeking restraints in business contracts rather than employment contracts.
Simply put a restraint of trade clause is used by a business/employer to protect their confidential information, goodwill, intellectual property and business interests.
There are various types of restraint clauses including:
These are very blunt instruments and the common law requires the party who wants to enforce the clause (generally an employer) to justify them.
The employer must prove that at the time of entering into the contract there were clearly circumstances that justified the restraint was reasonable.
In effect the employer must have a legitimate interest to impose the restraint and the scope of the restraint is no broader than to protect that interest.
Whilst courts have recognised restraints in circumstances where an employee has in their possession of confidential information which can be used detrimentally against the employer, enticing customers and clients away from the employer as well as other employees, it is not easy to enforce a restraint.
Courts consider all the circumstances in each case including but not limited to such things as:
Courts can:
The most common course of action is when an employer will try to obtain an injunction against the former employee to restrain them initially.
It is very rare that an employer will take a matter to a final hearing unless there are significant matters at risk.
In 2023 the Treasurer announced a competition review to improve competition across the Australian economy.
The review is to look at amongst other things the use of non-compete and related clauses in employment contracts.
This could lead to a range of options including the banning of such clauses other than for highly paid employees, restraints on the types of clauses that could be used and options for payment during the payment of the restraint period.
Whilst Restraint clauses are difficult to enforce employers should consider using other tools to protect their business and commercial interests such as longer notice periods, gardening leave, confidential information and intellectual property deeds, pursuing liquidated damages clauses where non-solicitation is breached and the use of paid non-compete periods.
At FC Lawyers, our experienced business and corporate team can assist with advising, drafting and litigating restraint of trade clause related issues across a broad range of industries and professions.
Contact our team today to discuss your options regarding restraint of trade clauses or any other employment and business legal matters you may need assistance with.